Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 6,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2009, 2:51 pm
We call it a bond release hearing, because although the Mayor's father was charged with a non-bondable offense for pointing a gun at his daughter (yeah, we know, but remember, it's Broward) the State Attorneys office appeared in court the very next day to say 1) they don't ever stipulate to bonds; but...2) recommended a bond of 15-25 thousand on the non-bondable offense. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 8:31 pm
In the past, the Court has held unconstitutional laws that punish people who don't belong in federal prison—even if the defendant himself does. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:08 am
(Originally posted at the ACLU of Illinois' blog.) [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:21 am
So we're sending these folks someplace that won't rehabilitate them.Finally, this bill will generate budget savings. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 11:15 pm
There isn't a judge in the REGJB who doesn't know that. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 6:45 am
We understand, but we generally don't care. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:51 pm
My object here is not to judge those positions--others may find that more appealing. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 4:11 am
But you don't have to stay 20 years. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:55 pm
At its core, the government's argument is: “You don’t need to know how we got into your computer (the exploit) because it does not change the information that we took from your computer (the private information copied and transmitted by the payload). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 11:47 am
Still, their recommendations in these three areas don't go far enough to fix the problems they identify. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
Whether there's anything left of Hoffman in the limited circumstance of an express money-back guarantee, we don't know, but this ruling pretty well kills the general proposition that a request for a refund is inherent in the concept of "ascertainable loss. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:28 am
2011 WL 3625105, at *10-11We’re sure that, to non-lawyers (any who managed to read this entire post), this whole discussion seems arcane and technical – and we don’t deny it. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:34 am
He didn’t say anything about it until we got the note.... [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
Florida, the death row inmate is challenging Florida’s unique capital system that involves the jury's simple majority recommendation on death, with the judge making the final decision whether the defendant is to be executed. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 6:31 am
Did you know that jurors don't have to follow the law? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:51 am
Don't even risk taking the chance. 2. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am
The lawyers don't quite know what you know, whether you're on top of an issue or clueless about it. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
Sure enough it was (we don't think it exists anymore) close to an interstate highway, which was part of the Supreme Court's commerce clause analysis. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 8:40 am
It's especially unfortunate we don't have an explication in light of the meat of Judge Vaidik's dissent which, unassailably in my view, says:Blakely is concerned with the enhancement of a defendant's sentence based on facts not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. 542 U.S. 296, 303-04 (2004). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:37 pm
Also, don't expect any system to be able to "fix" people. [read post]
