Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
HealthBridge Management, LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:54 am
<> RENEWABLE ENERGY - Proposed Rule. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:10 pm
An adult or another interested person, such as a family member, may also believe that an adult lacks capacity to establish an RDSP and wish to appoint a plan holder before approaching a financial institution (…) The Law Commission of Ontario recommends that the Government of Ontario implement a process that would enable adults to personally appoint an ‘RDSP legal representative’ to open and manage funds in an RDSP, where there are concerns about their capacity to… [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 5:59 am
Ben gave his take on the recent Elonis case at the Supreme Court and asserted that “threats are beyond the protection of the First Amendment because of their effects on other people. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 1:50 pm
Such companies have to look for powerful business partners to fund R&D work. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:29 pm
In any case, the procedures were reviewed and some minor amendments were made to ensure absolute clarity. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
But that authority to legalize the enterprise of the application of the rules through which popular government is ordered, and empowered, by the people, remains a contentious issue. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:48 am
Some pension funds are frustrated because it’s been three years since the court struck down part of Rule 14a-11 and the SEC hasn’t acted further. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Alabama, holding that life without parole for minors violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:46 am
The appeals court also expressly rejected the rulings by sister circuits that remuneration is a separate, threshold inquiry. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
A Georgia school district was not an “arm of the State” immune from suit in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment, ruled the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:08 am
Believing that limits on campaign funds are a direct impediment to the First Amendment right of free speech, he has opposed past reform efforts. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Alabama, in which the Court held that life without parole for minors violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the allegedly biased judge rules on the claim based on facts within her knowledge without first conducting an evidentiary hearing, or whether a federal court must grant AEDPA deference to the judge's determination when the evidence in the state-court record supports it. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:09 pm
According to the FAQ XXII, the Departments view any such employer’s payment arrangement part of a plan, fund, or other arrangement established or maintained for the purpose of providing medical care to employees regardless if the employer treats the money as pre-tax or post-tax to the employee that is group health plan coverage subject to the market reform provisions of ACA. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Carman 14-212Issue: (1) Whether, when a police officer approaches a residence to conduct a “knock and talk,” the Fourth Amendment requires the officer to go to the “front door” even where it reasonably appears that some other entrance is also customarily used by visitors; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that such a rule was “clearly established” for purposes of qualified immunity. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:25 am
PhoneDog and Kravitz subsequently settled the dispute so we will never know how the court would have ruled on this issue, but the court’s refusal to dismiss PhoneDog’s ownership claims may indicate that, at least in some circumstances, Twitter followers may constitute property. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service then intervened in an effort to get labor and management to agree. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 3:21 pm
The codicil amended the will to include a newborn grandson. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm
What rule 5(4) did was to make it clear that the requirement that the permission of the court was needed before a warrant could be issued was without prejudice to the further requirement that an application had to be made to fix the date for permission. [read post]
