Search for: "Bush v. United States"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2018, 8:56 pm
” But as the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bush v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm
What that law is will differ from state to state. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
During Tuesday’s oral argument before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 1:41 pm
" Relying on the Civil War era case of Ex parte Milligan, the lawyers argued that "the Constitution prohibits the military imprisonment of civilians arrested in the United States and outside an active battlefield. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:32 am
Bush (2008) ruled do have the right to challenge their detention in a U.S. court.? [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:01 pm
A Bush-era statute both forbids detainees from bringing claims based on the Geneva Conventions, and strips the civilian courts of all jurisdiction to entertain any challenge to “any aspect of the . . . treatment . . . or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was detained by the United States and has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Plaintiffs are represented by the unlikely but outstanding duo of Ted Olson and David Boies of Bush v Gore fame. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as a majority of the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:10 pm
Stopping the counting of votes and overruling democracy in Bush v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:32 pm
National Labor Relations Board, the United States Supreme Court dealt a severe blow to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and hundreds of NLRB decisions. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:20 pm
Fay Observer reports that: Jurors in the court-martial of a Fort Bragg soldier [United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:50 pm
United States Fish and Wildlife, et al., Case No. 08-CV-01490-AWI-GSA). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:13 am
My old friend Alejandro Manevich, now an attorney in Toronto, writes in with the following on today’s development in the extradition case of Abdullah Khadr: I thought your readers may be interested in this morning’s order by the Supreme Court of Canada denying leave to appeal in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm
This has resulted in a backlog of unresolved cases pending before the NLRB and in a case pending before the United States Supreme Court calling for the Supreme Court to decide whether the National Labor Relations Act permits the NLRB to act when there are only two sitting members of the NLRB, New Process Steel v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:07 pm
Jesse V. [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:08 am
United States, Khadr asks the justices to grant review and reverse the D.C. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:08 pm
However, when President Bush signed the bill into law, he stated that the law was not mandatory, but instead only advisory. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:04 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column, I explain why Monday's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Corizon, Inc., 949 F.3d 489, 506 (9th Cir. 2020) (Bumatay, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) (same); United States v. [read post]
