Search for: "In Re Phillips"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 1,893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2006, 12:09 am
Phillip E. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:53 pm
Instead, take action, and that action starts with contacting the experienced New Jersey hostile work environment attorneys at Phillips & Associates. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm
While there were certain overlapping characteristics, including the colours used and the animals depicted, the packages could not be called a colourable imitations of Phillip Morris’s copyright. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 4:32 pm
Xavier Von Erck wrote:They're Muslims. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
” More recently, in Re British Broadcasting Corporation [2010] 1 AC 145; [2009] UKHL 34 (concerning the proposed identification of an acquitted rapist subject to an anonymity ruling in a television programme about the abolition of the rule against double jeopardy) Lord Brown, with whom Lords Phillips, Hope, Walker and Neuberger all agreed, addressed, at [65]-[66], the same point as follows: “Why [D] asks rhetorically, cannot the BBC broadcast their programme… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media Research Inc (PatLit)… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(The Prior Art) Suggestions for fixing the US patent system (IP Watchdog) Obscure patent: Scriptured outdoor furniture (IP Watchdog) Published applications as prior art (Patently-O) Requester success rates in inter partes re-examination (Patently-O) Innovation Alliance video (Patently-O) Question on dedication of material (Patently-O) Bilski case: Financial services, patent experts seek more certainty on business-method patents (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents –… [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:23 am
Overkill, maybe: but we haven’t seen so much interest in a consistory court judgment since Re St Giles, Exhall. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
If you’re on the train working on my file on your laptop, you’re a criminal and you’re fired. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:33 am
Congress continues to govern by cliff—and now they’re doing so with national security authorizations. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:26 am
They're human. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm
"I am still heartbroken…and you're wounded, but you will survive. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Shaw Rose Nets (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) District Court S D California: In re TS Tech and In re Genentech do not apply where the requested venue is a neighbouring district: HP Hood LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
Judge Sontchi in in re Premier International Holdings disagreed sharply that Rule 2019 extends to ad hoc committees. [23] He then went on to explain that any amendments to Rule 2019 to increase the required disclosures would have no affect to those not already covered by the rule. [24]Judge Sontchi’s decision was in complete opposition to that of his counterpart, Judge Walwrath’s in in re Washington Mutual Inc. [25] Judge Walwrath used the currently proposed amendments… [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:02 pm
It doesn't tell you what they're doing. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm
As I noted in an earlier post on this case, Speers was convicted on various counts in 2003, the convictions were set aside and then he was re-tried, which is the case this opinion deals with. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:38 am
They're not talking about the results that I got. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:32 pm
So, to be fair, I excluded them from the list—this year only, of course—they’re eligible now to be included next year. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
We called Sargeant's counsel, Phillip Dye, Jr., of Vinson & Elkins, but didn't hear back. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
“We can act whether we’re lawyers or not as that first line of defense. [read post]
