Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 1561 - 1580 of 8,597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
And the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-185/05 Italy v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  An exception in legal malpractice actions might arise when the documents are very difficult legal writings, that a lay person might not understand, even when read. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:32 am by Lisa Guerin
Last week, the Supreme Court decided an employment discrimination case against a Lutheran school, Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am by Emma Cross
Link to part 1- http://ukscblog.com/new-judgment-jetivia-sa-anor-v-bilta-uk-ltd-ors-2015-uksc-23-part-1/ [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
    In April of last year, a Marshall jury in Judge Ward's court found for the plaintiff in QPSX Development 5 PTY LTD v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Si tard même que le délai de forclusion de l'Art 122(2) CBE 1973 était déjà expiré (dans le cas des taxes annuelles, le délai de grâce de 6 mois était déduit du délai normal d'un an). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Gitxaala Nation v Canada – The Enbridge Cases The Enbridge proposal would have seen diluted bitumen carried by pipeline approximately 1,200 kilometres from northern Alberta to Kitimat BC, across over 1,000 rivers and streams, to a new marine terminal. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 2:59 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 701 provides that If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness' testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the... [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:27 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 701 provides that If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness' testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the... [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:33 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Michigan Rule of Evidence 804(b)(2) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil action or proceeding, [for] a statement made by a declarant while believing that the... [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) provides that In a criminal case, an expert witness must not state an opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition that constitutes an element of the crime... [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:26 am by Pierre T. Nguyen
Comme les entreprises déposent de plus en plus à l’étranger, le PLT vise à uniformiser les règles nationales de pays signataires, pour éviter que des dépôts dans divers pays soient de véritables casse-tête. [read post]