Search for: "People v. House" Results 1561 - 1580 of 11,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am by MBettman
Constitution (“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause… and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:20 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Which House bill would give the government powers to snoop through people's personal information without a warDrant, proper oversight or limits? [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
The Court will explore in Bartlett v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
The White House denied that it would issue the leaked version of the executive order, but it did not denounce the leaked executed order, leaving the door open to future attacks against LGBT people, people seeking reproductive health care, women, and religious minorities. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 6:10 am
They went from apartment to apartment to tell people to leave and look for stragglers. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:14 pm
New posts at Section 1983 Blog, including one on Al-Kidd v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
In addition, while many of the houses of worship in Roman Catholic Diocese could seat well over 500 people, they were subject to attendance caps of ten or twenty-five persons, while retail businesses were not.... [read post]