Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 1561 - 1580 of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2011, 8:08 am by brettb
The state appeals court affirmed, relying on Geier v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
” Peralta was ordered removed on June 7, 1999.Peralta returned regularly to the United States. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
”  The name Earl Warren should ring a bell, as he would later become the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, at the time that the Court heard the Brown v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:57 am by Cormac Early
Perry and United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:49 am by Naomi Jane Gray
The outline also notes a late-breaking development in the YouTube case stemming from the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Global-Tech v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:52 pm by Kurt Opsahl
”  After its thorough analysis, the court declared “(1) that the Australian Injunction is repugnant to the United States Constitution and the laws of California and the Unites States; and (2) that the Australian injunction cannot be recognized or enforced in the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In addition, the trial court stated the California Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
For instance, the burden onPapst is mitigated by Papst’s status as a non-practicingpatent holder residing outside the United States. [read post]