Search for: "State v. Liberty" Results 1561 - 1580 of 10,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am by DARRYL HUTCHEON, MATRIX
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of either of the surrendering or the demanding country, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm by Matt Danzer
Abdo points to two concurring opinions in Jones v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:55 am by Anita Bernstein
June Medical Services LLC in this appellate incarnation has approved a law with no beneficial effect (unless one thinks that blocking lawful abortion is good for health, a motive for state action that Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:42 am
06/26/09 San Jose Mercury News (source: Gay Marriage Watch):In court briefs filed Thursday night, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Center for Lesbian Rights formally endorsed the arguments of a high-powered legal team trying to block Prop 8 in federal court in San Francisco.Here is the brief, and here is the press release by the American Foundation for Equal Rights. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 2(1) defines an extraditable offense as one punishable under the laws of both contracting States by deprivation of liberty for a period of more than one year, or by a more severe penalty. [read post]