Search for: "State v. Rowe" Results 1561 - 1580 of 3,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2010, 3:52 pm by Sherrilyn Ifill
Haley, in which forty indigent Alabama death-row inmates challenged the state’s failure to afford a right to counsel for death row prisoners in postconviction review cases. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:43 am by Steve Hall
Strictly speaking, this is true, but nearly forty years ago, the Supreme Court struck down all then-existing death penalty statutes in Furman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 1:48 pm
9-23-2008 Florida:Richard Henyard could be next, if his execution for the killings of 2 Eustis girls in 1993 is carried out as scheduled today.TAVARES - The last inmate from Lake County to be executed by the state of Florida didn't kill anyone.Sam Wiley Odom was 20 on Aug. 28, 1959, when he was strapped into the state's electric chair for raping a 63-year-old woman and electrocuted in front of a small audience that included Lake County Sheriff Willis V. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:57 am by John Floyd
  In macabre detail, the Eighth Circuit issued a March 6, 2018 decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
LEXIS 7039 (10th Cir 4/4/2011) “The state death-row prisoner was denied 28 U.S.C.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Maryland jurisprudence; and (3) whether executing a defendant who has already served more than thirty years on death row while exercising his legal rights in a non-abusive manner serves any penological purpose and amounts [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Because of the release of the Court’s opinion in Baze v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:05 am by Bexis
  We're content with that post stating all the many policy and practical reasons why such consolidations are prejudicial to the defense of cases (which is why plaintiffs seek them and some courts allow them), difficult for jurors to make sense of, and otherwise a bad idea.In that vein we applaud the decision in Johnson v. [read post]