Search for: "State v. Walters" Results 1561 - 1580 of 1,649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
  While this may seem unjust, courts have also upheld the franchise tag as a valid practice. [25]  Linebacker Wilbur Marshall challenged the validity by filing memorandum in federal court, where the designation was deemed fair and reasonable - the court stated that market conditions still favored players. [26]  Seeing that the franchise tag is a valid practice, the players will have to seek a forum other than the courts to address their issue with the designation.… [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
But if a court can determine that an offer is not FRAND, it presumably could also state wh [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
Military judge Army Colonel James Pohl calls the commission to order at 8:59 AM, noting that none of the five detainees have chosen to attend this morning’s session. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
"Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil 89 (Walter Kaufmann trans., Vintage Books 1966) (1886).What was done to Padilla is described this way:In an effort to gain Mr. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:01 pm by Randy Barnett
Walter Dellinger, a former acting solicitor general under President Bill Clinton, made a compelling case for the law’s constitutionality. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
Scruggs, you have heard the United States Attorney state what evidence he could present against you on this particular charge if the case were to go to trial. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
"Now, imagine you are the CEO or General Counsel of a telcom company that has been assisting the NSA in electronic surveillance for two years, assured that what appear to be your violations of FISA do not subject you to legal exposure because you have been relying on the certification "by the Attorney General of the United States that no warrant or court order is required by law. [read post]