Search for: "Barclay v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
Philipp v Barclays Bank UK PLC, heard 1st-2nd February 2023. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in this case gives further guidance on the dividing line between Ensign Tanker and Barclays Mercantile. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
Some states will subject the trust to tax if there is a resident co-fiduciary V. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 1:24 pm
Relying heavily on the case of Hollander v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants was heard on Thursday 28 November 2019. [read post]
19 May 2008, 4:41 am
E.D.N.Y. 2007) (quoting Barclays American/Business Credit v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 3:00 am
The issue of bad faith claims in the first party benefits lawsuits was reviewed by the Eastern Federal District Court in the case of Shea v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:30 am
In Jones v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Lord Clarke repeated a useful quotation of Longmore LJ from Barclays Bank plc v HHY Luxembourg SARL [2010] EWCA Civ 1248: “If a clause is capable of two meanings…it is quite possible that neither meaning will flout common sense. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:02 am
Instead, the court in this case, Barclays v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:23 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which ruled in Cabral v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The effect of this was to bypass all the protections contained in the Administration of Justice Acts, something which had been found to be perfectly lawful by the Court of Appeal in Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [2000] QB 263. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am
The case is New Jersey Basketball LLC v. [read post]
