Search for: "Barker v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
Consequently, as there was no medical evidence establishing a recognizable link between claimant's injuries and repetitive movements associated with her work activities, substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant did not establish that she sustained a causally-related occupational disease (see Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Barker v New York City Police Dept., 176 AD3d at 1272-1273; Matter of Glowczynski… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
Consequently, as there was no medical evidence establishing a recognizable link between claimant's injuries and repetitive movements associated with her work activities, substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant did not establish that she sustained a causally-related occupational disease (see Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Barker v New York City Police Dept., 176 AD3d at 1272-1273; Matter of Glowczynski… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:04 pm
In Dale v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
The Court applied the analytical framework as articulated in Barker v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:55 pm
The constitutional standard for a speedy trial was established by the United States Supreme Court in a case called Barker v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
The state judiciary rejected these arguments, Hill v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:57 am
Supreme Court established a four-part test for evaluating speedy trial claims in 1972’s Barker v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:12 pm
Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 121 (15 September 2011) Appeal from: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1169 See also: Innovation Patent Claims Once Again Construed Narrowly Claim construction – whether ‘device’ encompasses apparatus in two parts In an appeal from a decision of Justice Barker in the Federal Court of Australia, a full bench of the court comprising Justices Bennett, Gilmour… [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:46 am
It stated however that the defence costs are different as they were incurred in defending the claim which had the insurer’s consent. [read post]
3 May 2012, 11:00 am
In Tolbert v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:45 pm
Eldridge or the test employed in Barker v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:25 am
Abad v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 4:29 am
We sat next to a guy wearing a pink, bespangled, “I ♥ Bob Barker” sweatshirt. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:49 am
Judge Marcus wrote that the Court was bound by United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:45 pm
Barker Olmsted & Barnier, APLC [read post]
