Search for: "Barrett v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 1,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In dissent by himself, Justice Thomas did make originalist arguments but Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Alito did not join him.2021-2022:In Dobbs v. [read post]
In particular, NAGR and Bevis pointed to the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Contrary to the presumption underlying the Court's approach to vacatur under United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
There is an ongoing debate over whether the MQD is a substantive canon that serves separation of powers or simply a tool of ordinary statutory interpretation, as Justice Barrett argued in her concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Alito’s confirmation in 2006 kicked off a shift to the right that accelerated with the arrival of three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – nominated by former President Donald Trump. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]