Search for: "Bear Cloud v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
When it approved the CAT, the Commission stated that plan participants could “recoup their regulatory costs . . . through the collection of fees from their members, as long as such fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am by David Doniger
     In this thorough scientific process, no alternative theory – from sunspots, to clouds, to cosmic rays – has gone uninvestigated. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 But some justices also raised concerns that a decision siding with the television broadcasters could have far-reaching effects on new Internet, cloud and other technologies - and companies such as Google, Microsoft, DropBox and Box would then be swept up in other questions about the reach of copyright laws. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm by Joey Fishkin
 This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:56 am by David J. DePaolo
Just one year ago Boston University researchers issued a report on the autopsy of former Chicago Bears defensive back Dave Duerson. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:08 am by Matthew Nelson
  He went on to explain the dilemma by stating: “not preserving asks us to take a chance with our reputation. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:19 am by Dawn Mertineit and Katherine Perrelli
Finally, it bears noting that the few courts that have addressed MUTSA preemption have interpreted that issue narrowly. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
The evacuation will be carried out by trains and by buses, and those who refuse to evacuate will have to sign “a certain form of refusal from mandatory evacuation” stating they understand and are aware of all the consequences of staying in the combat zones and bear personal responsibility for their lives, Vereshchuk added. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
  That challenge is front and center in Mehanna v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:25 am
" DICTA IN THE 2LIVE CREW CASE SHOULD INFLUENCE HERE THAT PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE PENALIZED FOR TRYING TO CLEAR CLOUDS FROM TITLE. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:52 am
Supp. 2d 672, 682 (M.D.N.C. 2003) (ADEs "are not scientific proof of causation"); Cloud v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Stewards” of personal data should expect demanding requirements but with the hope for a federal standard that could lead to greater harmonization of the existing state-by-state patchwork. [read post]
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance seeks to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act passed by Parliament earlier this year to carve out India’s 29th State- Telangana from the erstwhile undivided State of Andhra Pradesh.[2] This Ordinance makes certain amendments to the territories covered by the Khammam district under this State bifurcation law. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm by firemarkVA
“Whether CrossFit may have been able to convince Facebook to remove Alvies’ page on some other ground has no bearing on CrossFit’s compliance with the DMCA. [read post]