Search for: "Bishop v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2007, 1:06 am
Five members of the United States Supreme Court voted to disallow partial-birth abortions. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am
LEXIS 31758 (ND NY, March 9, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a Rastafarian inmate that he was permitted to wear his crown (a religious head covering) only in his cell and housing unit, and not outside of these areas.In Peele v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:00 am
” The case involving the Massachusetts statute is McCullen v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby and Zubik v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
Kim Ward, has carried a torch for the bishops and blocked legislation that would pass if permitted to go to the floor. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:03 pm
utm_term=.e26cdbdc081bOf interest to patent people, Taney was in the dissenting four in Winans v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm
But in the wake of the court’s June decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
That led to fireworks on the floor of the United States Senate in 2005. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
That, in the judgment of this Council, it is perfectly consistent with the good faith which she owes to the Bishops and Dioceses with which she has been in union since 1862, for any Diocese to decide for herself whether she shall any longer continue in union with this Council;. . .V. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:17 am
In Doe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
The case went up to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
The Bishops Conference stated that “the degrading and distortion of religious symbols by purposely changing their meaning is contrary to public morals, especially when it is done in pursuit of commercial gain”. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:01 am
(quoting Bishop v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:51 am
Its initial purpose was to combat organized crime in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
As study after study has showed, residence, especially in urban centers, can be the most accurate predictor of race” (United States v Bishop, 959 F2d 820, 827-828 [9th Cir 1992]).Subsequently, however, in Boyde v Brown, (404 F3d 1159, 1171 [9th Cir 2005]) either sharply limited or overruled this holding:It may be unpersuasive for a prosecutor to use residence without attempting to tie it to the facts of the case. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 12:37 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 9:12 am
Zubik v City of Pittsburgh, 2025 WL 471533 (W.D. [read post]
