Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. WASHINGTON"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36). [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 7:14 am
Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:21 pm
In Bushansky v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
Yack v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
As a political matter, it would have to win support both in California, and in Washington DC, because the creation of new states requires, under Article IV of the federal Constitution, the consent both of the legislatures of the involved states and of Congress. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:18 pm
No. 1 of Grays Harbor County, Washington v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 2:22 am
Ball v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:48 pm
” And Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times reports that “Supreme Court weighs states’ power to control out-of-state products in California pork case. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 11:58 am
This morning, the California Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited opinion, McGill v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
Julie Rovner, the chief Washington correspondent for Kaiser Health News and a veteran health policy reporter, joins Amy Howe in the latest episode of SCOTUStalk to break down the case, California v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:27 pm
Doyle v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:29 am
Mother got a promotion and was transferred to Washington in early 2014. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
” The Complaint is captioned: State of Washington v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:13 am
In Scott Call Jolley v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
California, 2015 U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:21 am
He filed an amicus brief supporting the cert petition in NIFLA v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 1:32 pm
American University Washington College of Law Program on Information Justice & Intellectual Property PresentsSupreme Court Series:Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
In California Democratic Party v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 12:24 pm
The final complaint was filed by a Washington resident on behalf of a class of Washington customers. [read post]