Search for: "CARTER v. THE STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,851
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2009, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 11:35 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
For the petitioners: Carter G. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 9:32 am
See Carter's Adm'rs v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:59 am
State of Indiana and Steve Carter, AG (see yesterday's ILB summary here). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:44 pm
In Fox Television Statements, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:42 am
Carter v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
Carter has granted the federal government's motion to dismiss the pending lawsuit of Smelt v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
RIVERSIDE CONTRACTING, INC., a Montana corporation; UNITED RENTAL HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., n/k/a HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Massachusetts corporation; THE STATE OF MONTANA, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; and CARTER & BURGESS, INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:30 pm
In the case of State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:00 pm
This brief is well done (Carter Phillips/Evan Caminker) but also important in that it represents the views of Chief Justices of states from across the political spectrum. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
Arguing for the two companies will be Carter G. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 7:07 am
This court upheld Smith's conviction and sentence in 2004, but the Supreme Court vacated his sentence in light of United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
Karen Carter Peterson (D-New Orleans) to garner support for a bill she plans to introduce in April […] Read More [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:56 am
From North Carolina Lawyers Weekly: The trial court did not have a legal basis to order plaintiff to pay child support. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 8:44 am
In FreeEats.com, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:51 am
We apply the balancing test articulated in United States v. [read post]