Search for: "Cain v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2020, 10:02 am
Cain, 972 S.W.2d 749 (Tex. 1998). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Cain, 10-8145, argued on November 8. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Cases that might be particularly well-suited to a historian's perspective include United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
Cain, Visiting Research Fellow at the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance; and Jill Fisch, Saul A. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:15 pm
Cain, in which the Court — again, acting very much in an error-correction mode — directly took and overturned a state-court decision on Brady grounds. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:32 am
Cain, in which the Court — again, acting very much in an error-correction mode — overturned a state-court decision on Brady grounds. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims, 12-1217, and the trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Ryan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Cain, No. 13-1433. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:23 pm
President Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union address this evening, and it was even less exciting than last year (which was less exciting than the year before, when the famous Obama v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
Google, Doe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 7:34 am
Brief Introduction: On July 1, 2024, the Western District of Louisiana ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in the case, State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:30 am
Cain v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Jones (Sentencing)Cain v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:01 am
Cain (2012) and Connick v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Mary Ziegler on the Texas, the Supreme Court and Roe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 6:16 am
Cain, Visiting Research Fellow at the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance; Robert J. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Cain 14-567Issue: (1) Whether, when evaluating if a state court’s decision is based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court under 28 § U.S.C. 2254(d)(2), the clear and convincing standard of Section 2254(e)(1) governs the determination of unreasonableness; (2) whether the state court decision, finding no deficient performance, constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
