Search for: "Christopher Holder" Results 141 - 160 of 533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2020, 12:55 pm by Alexa von Uexküll
While the CJEU’s forthcoming decision in the Santen referral is expected to largely clarify the availability of “second medical use SPCs” in general, it should not be left unmentioned that there is a further pending referral, Novartis (C-354/19), which addresses the closely related question of whether the grant of a new SPC for a different therapeutic application is precluded if the new SPC is filed by the same rights holder who has already been granted an SPC for the same… [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm by Enrico Bonadio
The UKSC will consider whether Unwired Planet, as SEP holder, made use of a ‘time advantage’ to improve its negotiation position. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
The key participants, including FBI agents and supervisors, and Christopher Steele, were interviewed. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
‘One of the Hardest Decisions of My Life’: Kamala Harris ends once-promising campaign Politico – Christopher Cadelago and Caitlin Oprysko | Published: 12/3/2019 U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:59 am by Francois Pochart
Francois Pochart, Thierry Lautier and Lionel MartinThe PACTE law of May 22nd[1] introduced new opposition proceedings against French patents before the French PTO. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:57 am by Brian Cordery
This case confirms that the new approach taken by English Patents Courts to the issue of equivalence by immaterial variants is quite generous to patent holders. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:56 pm by Hetti Hilge
FRAND license offer of the SEP holder and information duty As a next step, the SEP holder has to make a license offer on FRAND terms and specify the way in which the royalty is calculated. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 8:01 am by Dan Harris
The holder of the secret took reasonable precautions to prevent disclosure of the secret. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:43 am by Daniela Ampollini
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Japanese Patent Law: Cases and Comments by Christopher Heath, Atsuhiro Furuta€ 181 Patent Law Injunctions by Rafal Sikorski€ 181 [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 7:15 am by Aysel Korkmaz Yatkın
In the light of the CoA decision, third parties, filing patent invalidation actions against a non-examined patent, should still be prepared for a possible conversion request of a non-examined patent holder. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:56 am by Miquel Montañá
Richter Gedeon) of the CJEU shows that patent holders had a point in arguing that the Court’s interpretation was not in line with Article 50 of the TRIPS Agreement. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 1:37 am by Francois Pochart
On another note, it should be mentioned that this “provisional escrow” mechanism does not solve the issue already existing when the seized party is a third party (e.g. for a pharma case, the National Agency for Medicines, known in France as ANSM), the actual holder of the trade secrets (in this case, the generics company) may not be informed that a seizure was carried out and may thus not be in position to challenge the order within one month to protect its trade secrets. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 1:28 am by Simon Holzer
It was sufficient that the product of the patent holder or its affiliates was effectively competing with the infringing goods. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am by Oswin Ridderbusch
While this result is not entirely unexpected, it is deeply disappointing that the fundamental question whether or not the consent of the holder of a marketing authorization is required for the filing of an SPC remains unresolved. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:25 pm by Katharine Trendacosta
Brady, Christopher Brady is alleged to have filed false DMCA claims—claiming he either owned things he did not or claiming videos were infringing that were not. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:58 am by Timothy B. Lee
However, this process can be abused—and boy did defendant Christopher L. [read post]