Search for: "Cunningham v. California"
Results 141 - 160
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2007, 5:04 am
" Here is the set up:In this two-part series of columns, I will examine [Cunningham v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:27 am
If you don't know about Cunningham v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 6:53 pm
There’s been quite a stir in the blogosphere over the Supreme Court decision in Cunningham v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 4:44 pm
The core of her holding in Cunningham, however, is that the California Supreme Court misinterpreted California's sentencing laws. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
Cunningham provides a big boost in two areas of current and future Ninth Circuit rehearings en banc.In Cunningham, the Court addressed the California state sentencing system, which permits a sentence at the high end of a guideline based upon certain findings. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 5:55 am
V. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 5:02 am
In Cunningham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:55 pm
Like Mark posted, in a 6-3 ruling yesterday, SCOTUS rejected California's 30 year-old sentencing law. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Cunningham contains interesting insights into the two newest Justices. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 9:19 am
Ray Suarez started his questioning of Marcia Coyle about yesterday’s Supreme Court Cunningham decision with the following:Today, the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
In Cunningham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 6:12 am
Ngo which also dealt with the PLRA".
Cunningham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
The 6-3 ruling in California v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:50 pm
Supreme Court's opinion in Cunningham. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court Jan. 22 decided 2 cases related to the criminal justice system: In Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:09 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:10 pm
For anybody who hasn't seen the Cunningham buzz yet:Sentencing Law and Policy (and here, here and here)SCOTUSblogThe ruling: Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 2:55 pm
This morning, The Associated Press reported that the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:21 am
In Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:08 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in three cases Monday, including Cunningham v. [read post]
