Search for: "Cunningham v. California" Results 141 - 160 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2007, 5:57 pm
The California Supreme Court — acting only 16 days after the nation's highest court humbled it with Jan. 22's Cunningham v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:04 am
"   Here is the set up:In this two-part series of columns, I will examine [Cunningham v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:27 am
If you don't know about Cunningham v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 6:53 pm
There’s been quite a stir in the blogosphere over the Supreme Court decision in Cunningham v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 4:44 pm
  The core of her holding in Cunningham, however, is that the California Supreme Court misinterpreted California's sentencing laws. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
Cunningham provides a big boost in two areas of current and future Ninth Circuit rehearings en banc.In Cunningham, the Court addressed the California state sentencing system, which permits a sentence at the high end of a guideline based upon certain findings. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:55 pm
Like Mark posted, in a 6-3 ruling yesterday, SCOTUS rejected California's 30 year-old sentencing law. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Cunningham contains interesting insights into the two newest Justices. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 9:19 am
Ray Suarez started his questioning of Marcia Coyle about yesterday’s Supreme Court Cunningham decision with the following:Today, the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court Jan. 22 decided 2 cases related to the criminal justice system: In Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:09 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:10 pm
For anybody who hasn't seen the Cunningham buzz yet:Sentencing Law and Policy (and here, here and here)SCOTUSblogThe ruling: Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 2:55 pm
This morning, The Associated Press reported that the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Cunningham v. [read post]