Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 141 - 160 of 47,801
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  That does rather require some crystal ball gazing: when will the first instance trial be listed? [read post]
However, the court did not find any recognized exceptions to the “pay first” rule apply. 1) There are no criminal penalties for failure to pay the replenishment fee. 2)  There is no due process concern from imposing the “pay first” rule because the action could proceed later once Mojave pays its balance; and 3) The Authority had conceivable basis in law or fact for assessing the replenishment fee. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 12:45 am by Jan von Hein
In its decision in Charles Taylor Adjusting, the ECJ held that decisions granting provisional damages for bringing proceedings in another Member State, where the subject matter of those proceedings is covered by a settlement agreement and the court before which proceedings were brought does not have jurisdiction on the basis of an exclusive choice of court agreement, are contrary to public policy under Art 34 (no 1) and Art 45(1) Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Thus, it does make sense to use a special monitor and have him or her publicly report to the court on the failures by Boeing. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Final Rule does not apply to court orders approving settlements with private parties. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:19 pm
 Pix credit here 新华社研究院the Xinhua News Agency Research Institute has recently circulated ( 更好赋能中国繁荣世界——新质生产力的理论贡献和实践价值] (Better empowering China to prosper the world - the theoretical contribution and practical value of new productivity (20 June 2024))--a fairly… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:20 pm
And, indeed, these are all moving targets--even as AI metastasizes in accordance with its own logic, so does the security apparatus of the United States/ Europe, and China (along with subaltern but much more military active dependencies). [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 10:10 am by Jodie E. Buchman and Michael J. Levin
In re Siegal, 591 B.R. at 624 (citing In re Robinson, No. 10-12932-SSM, 2011 WL 832857, at *2 (Bankr. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
However, the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Kazarian does not actually impose a final merits determination, nor does this requirement appear anywhere in the relevant regulatory criteria. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
IPSO 21812-23 Vulliamy v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 21746-23 Austin v The Metro, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 00016-24 Janner v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication Statements in Open Court and Apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies from the last week. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:30 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
It does, however, require covered employers to use a form known as the EEO-1 Component 1 data report to submit demographic information. [read post]