Search for: "Due v. Ahmed"
Results 141 - 160
of 230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Congress made an exception, however, for criminal prosecution, reflecting the Obama Administration’s public intention to try the 9/11 terrorists in federal court.7 Second, the federal government suffered what many considered to be a defeat in its prosecution of Ahmed Ghailani, an al-Qaeda terrorist and the first Guantánamo detainee to be tried in federal court. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
AE 144 Motion to Compel Discovery in the Possession of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Demonstrating the Guilt of Fahd Mohammed Ahmed alQuso and Jamal Ahmed Mohammad Ali al-Badawi Relat ing to the Present Charges u. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Joshi and others v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
Judgment was delivered on 13 July 2012 ([2012] EWHC1946 (QB)) On 11 July 2012, there was an applications in the case of Qadir v Associated Newspapers (in which there is due to be a trial of a preliminary issue on privilege in the week commencing 23 July 2012). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
A trial had been due to start on 3 July. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
., U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:55 pm
Lawyers for Yemeni national Salim Ahmed Hamdan urged the D.C. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:35 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
The standard for removal and subsequent trial in absentia in both federal and U.S. military courts is Illinois v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:46 am
Picking up on a government suggestion that the case of Hamdan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:54 am
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in M.Karunanidhi v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:34 pm
While distinguishing the dicta laid down in Mohammed Ahmed v Atma Ram Chauhan, the Delhi High Court observed that the facts therein related to the UP Rent Act and its ratio has no application to Delhi. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:07 am
This argument cannot be squared with Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:24 am
Ahmed White’s critique proceeds along roughly these lines. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
This was mostly due to an interpretation of the laws in place at the time that ostensibly forbade information sharing from those on the intelligence side with those on the law enforcement side. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
Ahmed Hussein MAHAMUD, Defendant. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
In 2010, the Strasbourg Court held Mr Ahmed’s application to be admissible in part but has not yet issued a judgment on the merits. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 2:26 pm
In 2010, the Strasbourg Court held Mr Ahmed’s application to be admissible in part but has not yet issued a judgment on the merits. [read post]
