Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 141 - 160 of 12,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 3:19 am by Paul Caron
Wendy Gerzog (Baltimore), Van Alen: A Reasonable Consistency, 142 Tax Notes 223 (Jan. 13, 2014): In Van Alen [v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:47 pm by John Diekman
In order to withstand dismissal, a public figure-plaintiff must allege that the defendant published the statements at issue with actual malice, that is, with either knowledge that they were false, or reckless disregard for the truth.Winklevoss v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:59 pm by Gene Quinn
It has been just over two months since the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 1:24 am by Jani Ihalainen
The case of Deichmann SE v EUIPO concerned the registration of a trademark involving a cross design on the side of a shoe, where the shoe itself was marked using dotted lines to illustrate the position of the mark (EUTM 2923852). [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 1:24 am by Jani Ihalainen
The case of Deichmann SE v EUIPO concerned the registration of a trademark involving a cross design on the side of a shoe, where the shoe itself was marked using dotted lines to illustrate the position of the mark (EUTM 2923852). [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
Indeed, it's sufficiently rare that it took me quite a while to figure out even what happened.It's a forum selection clause issue. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:46 am
Well, armed with these jury instructions, they did what most people seem to do when faced with the dark art of calculating patent infringement damages: they stuck their nine figures in the air, filled out a form, and came up with a number..." [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
 Having rejected Figure 2, Birss J should not have found the claims obvious, Genentech alleged.Not so, said Floyd LJ. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:07 am
 We're done trying to figure out the true motivation behind your grants of review. [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:20 pm by Sandy
The Second Circuit held that a school can prohibit a student newspaper from publishing a sexually explicit stick-figure cartoon.R.O. v. [read post]