Search for: "Firestone v. Firestone" Results 141 - 160 of 275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2009, 9:36 pm
December 8, 2009 - 2 PM: Bridgestone Firestone North America Tire, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am by Sean Wajert
In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 288 F.3d at 1015.See also Isaacs v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 863 P.2d 795, 823 (Cal. 1993) (“as a result of a defendant's tortious conduct”); Meyer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
See, e.g., Bridgestone/Firestone Rsch., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am by Alex Woolgar
This is largely derived from the reasoning of Lord Wilberforce in General Tire v Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Limited [1975] 2 All ER 173 – a patent case in which it was held that "[d]amages should be liberally assessed but.. the object is to compensate the plaintiffs and not punish the defendants".The court is looking for the royalty which "would have been arrived at in negotiations between the parties, had each been making reasonable use of their… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:22 am by N. Peter Rasmussen
Firestone, associate director in the Division of Enforcement. . [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:48 pm by Jacek Stramski
Firestone, 448 So. 2d 984, 990 (Fla. 1984)). [read post]