Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2009, 6:34 pm
But in Prowel v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
See Windsor v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:33 pm
See Romer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:06 pm
Virginia, which struck down anti-miscegenation laws in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:31 pm
In a lengthy opinion joined by three other members of the court, he insisted that Lawrence was a narrow holding that states could not use the criminal law to penalize the private consensual sexual activities of gay adults. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:42 pm
In Boseman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
Mark Leno, the first openly gay individual to serve in the California state senate, was one of the primary supporters of legalizing gay marriage throughout the nation. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:29 am
In Faust v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm
The court has now issued a new opinion (Apilado v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:22 pm
There is a Ninth Circuit precedent, the 1990 ruling in High Tech Gays v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:24 am
" Meanwhile, Goodridge v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:42 am
Arizona) and Obergefell (v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 9:11 pm
The Supreme Court’s marriage equality case, Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Connecticut (contraception,) Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:11 am
The attorneys and staff at Wessel, Lehker, & Fumelle add our voices to the joyful choir welcoming the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
