Search for: "Hare v State" Results 141 - 160 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:30 am
According to Joan, and to this less detailed Star-Bulletin piece, prosecutors, who had no desire to press on with charges, essentially stipulated to a ruling based in doctrines discussed in State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:59 pm
First, a possible solution is the application of the Coase Theorem, which is well-known to lawyers through its application in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:00 am
Heyman, Hate Speech, Public Discourse, and the First Amendment, (in Extreme Speech and Democracy, Ivan Hare, James Weinstein (eds.), Oxford University Press, Forthcoming).Maleiha Malik, Religious Freedom and Multiculturalism: R (Shabina Begum) V Denbigh High School, (King's Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2 (July 25, 2008)).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Adam Grieser, Peter Jacques & Richard Witmer, Reconsidering Religion Policy as Violence: Lyng v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:07 am
Issue: Whether Chicago violated the Free Exercise Clause by, in efforts to expand O'Hare International Airport, seeking to amend state law to exempt religious cemeteries surrounding the airport from the Illinois Religious Freedom and Restoration Act. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
El choque injusto de la muerte sucedió en el I-90 en State Street/Illinois 30 rampa en Elgin, Illinois. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 12:47 pm
  The United States Supreme Court will examine this issue in a case with far-reaching implications - Scott v. [read post]