Search for: "Home Insurance Co. v. New York"
Results 141 - 160
of 529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2018, 7:06 pm
New York Cent. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:50 pm
A specific example of this can be found in American Home Assurance Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:29 pm
Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient.The seminal New York case on this issue is Horn Waterproofing Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 12:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm
J. v American Home Assur. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:17 am
Co.(3rd Dept., decided 11/30/2017)No, not HOME as in four-fifths of the Greats Lakes. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
For example, in February 2017, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, applying New York law, reversed a lower court’s rejection of the disclosure-only settlement of a suit that had been filed in connection with Verizon’s proposed acquisition of Vodafone subsidiaries holding ownership interests in Verizon Wireless, as discussed here. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:36 am
Based in New York, the firm invests in healthcare and several other sectors. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Home Insurance Co., “the law is clear that a reasonable settlement binds the insurer to indemnify. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Home Insurance Co., “the law is clear that a reasonable settlement binds the insurer to indemnify. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Thus, a challenge for error in the application of New York law governing the Bermuda Form is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence that the tribunal consciously disregarded the provisions of New York law.4 Furthermore, an English court will permit a challenge based on an error of law only if certain conditions are met, and the challenger must show that “the decision of the tribunal on the question is obviously wrong” or that “the question… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Thus, a challenge for error in the application of New York law governing the Bermuda Form is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence that the tribunal consciously disregarded the provisions of New York law.4 Furthermore, an English court will permit a challenge based on an error of law only if certain conditions are met, and the challenger must show that “the decision of the tribunal on the question is obviously wrong” or that “the question… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:34 am
A New York trial court held last week in American Home Assurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:34 am
A New York trial court held last week in American Home Assurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:43 pm
" Faulkner v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:43 pm
" Faulkner v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
With regard to the substantive law, one of the reasons that insurers have long favored New York substantive law is because, as home historically to many insurers, New York has a well-developed body of law applicable to insurance policies of all kinds and many believe that New York law tends to favor the rights and interests of insurers. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
With regard to the substantive law, one of the reasons that insurers have long favored New York substantive law is because, as home historically to many insurers, New York has a well-developed body of law applicable to insurance policies of all kinds and many believe that New York law tends to favor the rights and interests of insurers. [read post]
