Search for: "IN RE RULES GOVERNING DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS"
Results 141 - 160
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
The Law Society can bring discipline proceedings against its licensees on either basis (or both). [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
Jeffrey Clark was a well-respected attorney in private practice and government. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:56 am
Ch. 2005) (sanctioning and fining out-of-state counsel under Rule 11 and Rule 37 for filing a deceptive complaint, improperly certifying that the plaintiff was fit to serve a [read post]
10 May 2014, 1:37 pm
In collaboration with the Working Group, OHCHR provides guidance on interpretation of the Guiding Principles (A/HRC/RES/21/5). [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
(Tex. 2009)HOW MANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE ENOUGH FOR AN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PANEL? [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Student files 13-count complaint against the university, alleging, among other things, that the school's handling of her disciplinary proceeding violated its policies. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
All of these mechanisms the court said are operating to make sure that in most cases prosecutors know what they’re supposed to do and that it’s only in an extreme case that would be completely unpredictable where they’re going to fail. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
The lawyer sought to convert the Law Society of Ontario (“LSO”) penalty proceeding to an invitation to attend (“ITA”) which would have resulted in “a dismissal of the application, no disciplinary record and an in-camera admonition from the panel” (para 25). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:24 am
” There is a “possibility” that private prison firms will manipulate disciplinary proceedings to “sustain their occupancy rates. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:59 pm
The Council’s note is a reminder that advertising in Canada is governed not only by the Competition Act and other general “framework” legislation, including consumer protection legislation, but also by a variety of industry and sector specific rules – in the case of real estate licensees in British Columbia, this includes the Real Estate Council’s Rules (see: Real Estate Council Rules). [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 1:21 am
Yet rather than battle it out in court, Intel is trying to put the brakes on the proceedings by using a relatively new government process -- inter partes re-examination -- that's becoming an increasingly popular way for accused infringers to get patents invalidated. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
So they're willing to say that it was worth multimillion [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
In a subsequent footnote (Slip Opinion at 11, note 5), the court again remarks: the independent adjudicative nature of courts-martial is not inconsistent with their disciplinary function, as the dissent claims. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
Moreover, apart from the normal platitudes about how we all suffer every time an innocent person is convicted of a crime, the failure to turn this information over has resulted in the expenditure of an astronomical number of lawyer hours to resolve this matter — through both the appeal process and disciplinary proceedings for the offending prosecutor. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
After we vacated the conviction and gave Arizona a chance to re-try Milke, the Arizona Court of Appeals barred any re-trial in an opinion so scathing it made the New York Times. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
The Episcopal Forum, for those who may not remember, was instrumental in instigating the bringing of disciplinary charges againt the Rt. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Ciavarella[17] pulls no punches: With utter disdain for the rule of law, defendants Mark A. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
The Board Rules contain still other rules governing physician practices. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
The Board Rules contain still other rules governing physician practices. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
Also, responding to Lady Hale’s speech to The Law Society on legal aid cuts, the UKSC blog remarks that the Supreme Court Justice took an “unusual” step by implicitly endorsing criticisms levelled at the government’s justice policy, leaving her vulnerable to a potential application for recusal should legal proceedings on the policy ever reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
