Search for: "In the Interest of A. E. v. The State of Wyoming"
Results 141 - 159
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
(Wyoming Law Professor Stephen M. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
The decision, written by the court’s presiding judge, James E. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:07 am
Professor Barton “Buzz” ThompsonThompson is the Robert E. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
Other State Registered IA. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
Other State Registered IA. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Excise taxes on rental cars are levied at the state-level in 44 states. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:02 am
” In this regard, it is interesting to note that the leading precedent the government relies on is United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 12:30 pm
If life were fair, something called Just Puppies v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 7:05 am
The Report repeatedly emphasizes that legislation should ensure issuance is limited to insured depository institutions that have access to emergency liquidity and Federal Reserve services.[12] While not mentioned in the Report, this creates significant uncertainty on the ability of entities that have received newly created state bank charters or trust-only charters from being able to issue stablecoins where those bank charters may not result in entities being eligible… [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
Recent settlements: skid-e-kids involved a big fine for failure to comply. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 10:00 am
Everson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The adoption of the CAT, therefore, was—and remains—a matter of significant controversy, as well as the subject of considerable interest for policymakers and tax economists. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
