Search for: "JR v. IR "
Results 141 - 160
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 12:30 pm
See also, Lower Vein Coal Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
See also, Lower Vein Coal Co. v. [read blog]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
See also, Lower Vein Coal Co. v. [read blog]
7 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
” On May 2, 2005, the IRS issued Rev. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:02 am
Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:53 pm
Going back to the Court’s ruling in the case of Helvering v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
Verrilli, Jr., with one hour of time. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
Verrilli, Jr., will have 30 minutes of time, and Gregory G. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:15 pm
See Pineck v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:55 am
+v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:25 am
There have been times in my life when certain words gained meaning all of a sudden. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:39 am
Higdon Jr. and Brian S. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:56 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:48 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:04 am
For many taxpayers, taking the EITC is the equivalent of asking the IRS for an audit. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm
., v. [read post]
