Search for: "Jack Doe 2" Results 141 - 160 of 2,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 7:32 am
Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that does not function as a trademark or service mark. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am by Frank Cranmer
It’s always diagonal. https://t.co/lIi5WvVtyG — Jack Palmer-White (@jackpalmerwhite) November 21, 2023 [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In 2018 President Trump jacked up tariffs on solar panels to "protect the domestic solar panel industry. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 6:05 am by Rogier Bartels
The KSC and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (SPO) are probably best known in the United States for being the former employer of Special Counsel Jack Smith. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Prosecutors Urge Appeals Court to Reinstate Trump Gag Order Yahoo News – Kyle Cheney (Politico) | Published: 11/14/2023 Donald Trump’s renewed attacks on the family of special counsel Jack Smith and his repeated invective against likely witnesses in his Washington, D.C. criminal case warrant the urgent restoration of a gag order against him, prosecutors argued. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:58 am by Tom Joscelyn
But it is a safe bet that Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team took notice. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In Jack Daniels, the Court claimed that the likely confusion test “does enough work to account for the interest in free expression” in the context of trademark uses. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
And none of those would really be excludable under 2(a) or 2(d) based on the false suggestion clause because they would imply a connection between the living individual and the product, but what it would be a connection that actually existed. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Where the law requires only that the defendant have intentionally acted in some way, it does not matter that the defendant believed in good faith--whether on the basis of counsel's advice or for some other reason--that the conduct was legal. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
; (2) If so, did the defendant believe that publishing the statement complained of was in the public interest? [read post]