Search for: "John's and Jane's Does"
Results 141 - 160
of 453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2008, 4:59 pm
Title would be held as "John Doe and Jane Doe, husband and wife, as community property. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:02 am
Let's assume they do so and Jane Doe befriends both of them. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 5:57 am
The lawsuit listed in turn the misdemeanours of dozens of John/Jane Does, which include counts of "harassment," "stalking," and "cyber-bullying. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 7:33 pm
He'll be hearing from Jane Hamsher about this, I imagine. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
“Does that feel like enough to you? [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 10:00 am
I think this is problematic because, in the event of an appeal of a grant or denial of the motion to proceed anonymously, the legal arguments are better separated from the plaintiff's true name and address.- Traditionally the anonymous names are "Jane Roe" or "Jane Doe" for a female plaintiff, "John Doe" for a male plaintiff, and the use of colors (e.g. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Emengo, said the Appellate Division, was required on the independent ground of sovereign immunity, whether or not the failed to address this aspect of the Supreme Court’s decision and deemed him to have abandoned his appeal with respect to Supreme Court’s dismissal of his City HRL claims.* The NYSIF administrators are denominated “John and Jane Doe” in the caption of the decision.** The decision notes that Emengo “was a black… [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:43 am
It's simply a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren't excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say that Jane Doe told him that the defendant - Richard Roe - who's on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
30 May 2014, 10:50 am
For example, your trust could state that John Smith shall be trustee for the benefit of Jane Smith, until Jane reaches the age of 25 (or age 30 or whatever age you think is appropriate), and furthermore, before that age, the trustee shall only use the funds for Jane Smith's health and education. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:21 am
The statute does not use the term kidnapping a hostage, but that's the idea. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 1:52 pm
John's School for the Deaf in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:40 am
That doesn't happen too often, so it's certainly worthy of attention when it does. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:44 pm
Nor could a jury conclude that it was reasonably foreseeable -- i.e., that Defendants knew or should have known -- that John Doe would be abused as a result of Defendants' conduct and that Defendants were therefore grossly negligent in placing Reyes in, and not removing him earlier, from Doe's residence. ... [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:14 pm
The seminal article on these CIA programs by The New Yorker's Jane Mayer -- who interviewed Brennan and identified him as a "supporter" of these programs despite "the moral, ethical, and legal issues" -- does not exist in the journalists' world. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
Concluding that Indiana's right of publicity law, which took effect in 1994, is not retroactive and does not apply to personalities who died before its enactment, the court found that the plaintiff failed to state a right of publicity claim. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
Moreover, as with the previous iterations, this lawsuit seeks to gain the identities of the Doe's from the ISP's. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:25 am
It began with an anonymous court filing pitting “John Doe” against “Jane Doe. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 1:17 pm
There are also a variery of situations where a John Doe defendant is appropriate, although in my experience the designation is over used.If there's enough information in the complaint describing the proper defendant, even if there was a mistake in the name, it can make a correction go more smoothly. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
It then becomes difficult for Jane or her attorney to rebut what John Doe had told the jury; they can't cross-examine the person who allegedly said these things about Jane. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
I thought I'd pass along a long excerpt from this amicus brief, which my students Samantha Frazier, Katelyn Taira, and Jacob Haas and I wrote on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition and myself; for more on the decision below, which indeed rejected pseudonymity, see here. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
