Search for: "Kern v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
In Hagen v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
[11] Kern, supra note 5 [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: April 11, 2023 Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Higgitt, JJ. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: April 11, 2023 Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Higgitt, JJ. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 10:30 pm
Kerns, LLC. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:31 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:05 am
Second, the Court examined the precedent cited by plaintiffs, focusing on SEC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
’ Kerns v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:10 am
" Similarly, in Bailey v Kern, 177 Misc 904, the Court said that it did not have the power to command an appointing authority to fill a vacancy because the discretion to make appointments is vested in the appointing authority. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:45 am
What is it about Kern County? [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 3:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:51 am
Kerns, Esquire. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:30 pm
Kerns, LLC. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
” And in Roberts v. [read post]
A California Judge Allows a Baker to Discriminate Against a Lesbian Couple Who Wanted a Wedding Cake
7 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
” And in Roberts v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
** Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
** Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Had nearly twenty years of police service with the Police Department, prior to which he served in the United States Army for eight years where he was a sergeant in the military police, receiving an honorable discharge; 2. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Had nearly twenty years of police service with the Police Department, prior to which he served in the United States Army for eight years where he was a sergeant in the military police, receiving an honorable discharge; 2. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
