Search for: "Laurence Tribe" Results 141 - 160 of 782
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 5:33 am by jonathanturley
On CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront,” Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe declared that Trump can now be charged with the attempted murder of former Vice President Mike Pence “without any doubt, beyond a reasonable doubt, beyond any doubt, and the crimes are obvious. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:25 am by jonathanturley
In past columns, we have discussed how Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe seems intent upon running through the entire criminal code in declaring clear evidence of every federal crime by former President Donald Trump and/or his family. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Along with Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe and my Cornell Law colleague and fellow Verdict columnist Professor Sherry Colb, I filed one of those briefs. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 7:17 am by jonathanturley
Despite that overwhelming opinion, he listened to Professor Laurence Tribe at the urging of Pelosi. Despite the pledge to return to a respect for the “rule of law,” Biden openly suggested that they could use the litigation to get as much money out the door as possible before being barred by the courts. [read post]
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:56 am by Samuel Bray
Few appreciate that it was Roe's defense of this particular premise that John Hart Ely and Laurence Tribe so famously scorned. [read post]
18 May 2022, 8:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The post Isaac Chotiner Interviews Professor Laurence Tribe appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
16 May 2022, 6:56 am by jonathanturley
Democrats agreed (as did a later federal judge) that Clinton knowingly committed perjury under oath, but Democratic witnesses like Professor Laurence Tribe insisted that impeachment was simply not that broad. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe wrote that “one of the most curious things about Roe is that, behind its own verbal smokescreen, the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found. [read post]
13 May 2022, 9:05 am by jonathanturley
Harvard Law professor emeritus Laurence Tribe has long been an endless font for the media in claiming clear evidence of a variety of crimes for the imminent prosecution of Donald Trump. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:03 am by Kathryn Rubino
.' The post Harvard Law’s Laurence Tribe Says What We’re All Thinking About The Supreme Court appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:14 am by jonathanturley
Yet, scholars like Harvard Professor Laurence Tribe have endorsed this sweeping interpretation. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Guest Blogger This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:43 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  The Twelfth never came up in law school (even in that class), and no one thought it ever would.Today, however, I published a new Verdict column, returning to a topic that I had explored with Professors Michael Dorf and Laurence Tribe in September 2020. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
From a misreading of the Twelfth Amendment.In late September 2020, I co-authored a Verdict column with Professors Michael Dorf and Laurence Tribe, in which we showed that the clear text of the Twelfth Amendment did not support the Trumpists’ scheme. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
I'll then locate that fact in a somewhat broader context concerning the Constitution's ambiguities.In September 2020, Professor Laurence Tribe wrote an op-ed in the Boston Globe arguing that the Vice President lacks the power to cast a decisive vote to confirm a Supreme Court Justice if the Senate divides equally. [read post]