Search for: "Law v. Cross" Results 141 - 160 of 16,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; see generally CDR Créances S.A.S. v Cohen, 23 NY3d 307, 315; ), no such cause of action has been pleaded in this case (see DeMartino v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, 189 AD3d 774, 775). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Overriding Pennsylvania law to permit cross-jurisdictional class action tolling in federal court of state law economic loss claims.Stone v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 11:00 pm
Seventh Circuit rejects defense proposed jury instruction and cross-examination of detective concerning possible violation of state law requiring interrogations be recorded, since any violation of state law was irrelevant, in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:57 am by David Super
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in an important Social Security Disability Insurance case, Biestek v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:08 pm
The right of cross-examination is an absolute right, the denial of which may constitute a denial of due process of law. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:08 pm
The right of cross-examination is an absolute right, the denial of which may constitute a denial of due process of law. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 10:21 am by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: Deadly Crash Came After Years of Complaints About Rail Crossing, Nov. 10, 2015, By McNelly Torres and Willard Shephard, NBC Miami More Blog Entries: Estate of Gagnon v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:39 am
Cross-posted at Opinio JurisIn something of a surprise move, the Supreme Court decided today to grant cert in Kiyemba v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 In a court order approving a settlement agreement (full text) in Greene v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
The judgment The statement of the law in this area was summarised by the Court of Appeal in Imerman v Echenguiz [2010] EWCA Civ 908, in which Lord Neuberger MR said “where a privileged document had been seen by an opposing party through fraud or mistake, the court has power to exercise its equitable confidentiality jurisdiction, and ‘should ordinarily intervene, unless the case is one where the injunction can properly be refused on the general principles affecting the… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
”Lastly, Blue Cross seeks dismissal of the Michigan antitrust law claims on the ground that the state laws specifically exempt the challenged conduct from their reach. [read post]