Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 141 - 160
of 14,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
In this instance, said the court, "the testimony of the officer who interviewed eyewitnesses and the [police accident reconstructionist's] report were sufficient to establish that [Petitioner] violated Vehicle and Traffic Law §1111 by entering the intersection while the light was red and striking the pedestrian in the far cross-walk approximately four seconds after the traffic control device turned from yellow to red. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 4:13 am
After four stops at the lower courts, Kenneth Hahn v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 1:33 am
State jurisdiction is to become more attractive, especially for cross-border disputes. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:39 pm
By Sanjitha Ravi, Jindal Global Law School, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India The Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”) in Frontier Holdings Ltd v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 7:47 am
Olga V. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:07 am
Before the digital age, attorneys had to manually cross-reference case citations through books' pocket parts to make sure the cite was still "good law. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 5:00 am
Four years ago, in Germany v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 9:00 pm
LP v C. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 7:16 am
The leading case in Canada is called R. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 2:45 am
There is no cross appeal against that determination and it is binding on NHG as far as the years 2016 to 2023 are concerned. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 1:58 am
The Law Society Gazette has more information here. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 4:21 pm
” Crownover v. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 5:57 am
How the Eric Adams criminal case is resolved could not be more important to the rule of law in America. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 8:24 am
In Printz v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 6:14 am
In the foundational separation-of-powers case Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 5:15 am
The defendants opposed the plaintiffs’ cross-motion. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 11:34 am
The panel summarizes: “Because Doe’s state law claims necessarily implicate Grindr’s role as a publisher of third-party content, § 230 bars those claims. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 8:39 am
Criminal law — Cross-examination on text messages — Judicial discretion Darius Williams appeals his convictions in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for second-degree murder and carrying a deadly weapon […] [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 6:59 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 11:49 am
As I’ve mentioned many years, requiring publishers to cross-check government databases as part of vetting third-party content is a 230 workaround that eviscerates the law. [read post]
