Search for: "MATTER OF R T" Results 141 - 160 of 53,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 79/91 [2.2-2.5], and T 246/91, point 7 (both not published in OJ). [1.8] In connection with the interpretation of R 57a EPC 1973 (now R 80) [the patent proprietor] referred to decisions T 1138/02, T 181/02, T 223/97, T 610/95, G 1/84, G 9/93, and G 1/05. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It also commented on added subject-matter and lack of inventive step, though these comments were said not to form part of the decision. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 7:21 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
We give our clients confidence that someone has their back no matter how simple or complicated their tax return. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:27 am
Thomas Kleinlein (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena - Law) has posted Matters of Interpretation: How to Conceptualize and Evaluate Change of Norms and Values in the International Legal Order. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In general, the presently claimed subject-matter has to be examined for compliance with A 83 on the basis of the application documents as originally filed. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus the disputed matter (Streitstoff) that is relevant for the appeal proceedings results from the SGA and the corresponding reply. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:47 am by Glenn Reynolds
GOOD QUESTION: “If deficits didn’t matter as many like Economist James Galbraith argue today, why should citizens even pay taxes? [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this respect the Board concurs with the findings of T 1149/97 [6.1.9-10] that a “cut-off” effect due to the grant of a patent can be seen in the formal restrictions imposed on further amendments to the patent specification by R 80 and R 138 and, substantively only in the restriction imposed by A 123(3). [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
According to the Examining Division, the subject-matter claimed in the sole request lacked inventive step and claim 5 was not clear. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:42 am by Seth Borden
“As a matter of sovereignty, the tribes don’t need big labor meddling in their affairs,” said Rep. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Moreover, as a matter of principle, it lies in a party’s responsibility to file its requests in an unambiguous manner. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:40 pm by Glenn Reynolds
ALAN DERSHOWITZ: I Won’t Vote For Obama If Associated With ‘Stalinist Bigots’ Media Matters. [read post]