Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
., Davison v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
On April 19, the Supreme Court delivered a decision in Türkiye Halk Bankasi S.A. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
The theory is that because any one client can waive the privilege, none can assert the privilege against the other’s wishes. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
Australia’s highest court emphatically rejected the relevance of reputation in either the allegedly infringing or infringed mark is relevant to the assessment of deceptive similarity, ruling that PROTOX and “instant BOTOX alternative” do not infringe the registered trade mark BOTOX. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
Mathews v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:58 pm
From Bragg v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion for the Court in Axon v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 6:35 am
Do You Wish to Know? [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:06 am
The agency marked several significant accomplishments in FY 2022. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:44 am
The Supreme Court handed down its decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
Federal Court Allows Amendment To Complaint To Add Punitive Damages Claims in Trucking Accident Case
27 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
In the case of Stelzer v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:50 am
Carney of the Central District of California issued a preliminary injunction in Boland v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:37 pm
In Twitter v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
The Office’s 2022 Exam Guide In May 2022, the Office issued Examination Guide 1-22 titled Clarification of Examination Evidentiary Standard for Marks Refused as Generic. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
(Heckman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
In so far as the relevant public pays little attention to a sign which does not immediately give an indication of origin or destination of what it wishes to sell, but rather information which is exclusively promotional and abstract, it will not take the time to seek out the various possible functions of the expression or to memorise it as a trade mark (T-749/18). [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:37 pm
Madam Justice Horsman’s decision in Canfield v. [read post]
