Search for: "NEW YORK v. EARL" Results 141 - 160 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm by James Romoser
In a unanimous ruling, Chief Justice Earl Warren called bans on interracial marriage “odious to a free people. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:21 am
Last week, Yale Law Professor Akhil Amar and I were the guest speakers at a lunch of the judges of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Casey, and the Bruen ruling invalidating a New York gun regulation as violative of the Second Amendment. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:05 pm by Jack McNeill
  Formulating a soda tax fit for consumption: a pragmatic approach to implementing the failed New York soda tax. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and… [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:44 am by Mark Walsh
“It is beyond dispute that he would have rushed to the ramparts had he lived to see the concomitant attack on the rule of law and the courts that is now occurring,” John Sexton, the president emeritus of New York University and former dean of its law school, said in the courtroom where Burger presided from 1969 until 1986. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 4:03 am by SHG
As Nikolas Bowie and Daphna Renan explain in the New York Times, it’s time for Congress to seize control of the Constitution from the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am by admin
  Cole thinks Vernon contemptible   Actually, quite a bit longer, as uncovered in this August, 2006 New York Times article (Georgia):   Vernon business owners eat at La Villa Basque, owned by Mayor Leonis C. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
New York: [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States…. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by Laurence Tribe
Texas, a growing number of state-level laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, the impending fall of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” and full same-sex marriage rights in Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire, Vermont, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
 In a later essay published in The New York Review of Books, he explained that, “Arbitrariness in the imposition of the death penalty is exactly the type of thing the Constitution prohibits, as Justice Lewis Powell, Justice Potter Stewart, and I explained in our joint opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:55 am by Margaret Wood
  In the United States, it has only been staged in New York four times, but the play has been staged more frequently in England – most recently in 2004. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm by ALeonard
Cardozo, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who all lacked federal judicial experience but who had served with distinction on the highest courts of New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts. [read post]