Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 141 - 160 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2009, 1:41 pm
  Since he's (arguably) a celebrity, he'd be considered a public figure and would have to satisfy the higher actual malice standard set out in The New York Times Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
”) (citing New York Times); City of Chicago v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
App. 3d. 755, 758 (pdf) (biopsy allowed); Sullivan, Long & Haggerty, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm by charley foster
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), and New York Times Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm pleased to say, though, that American law has turned sharply against attempts to punish speech that insults or even defames foreign political leaders; the old libel rules wouldn't survive New York Times Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Times Co., written by Judge John Walker and joined by Judges Reena Raggi and Richard Sullivan: Plaintiff Sarah Palin appeals the dismissal of her defamation complaint against defendant The New York Times ("the Times") and its former Opinion Editor, defendant James Bennet, for the second time. [read post]
6 May 2018, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
MacLennan (1908), the case that first recognized something like an "actual malice" test for speech about public officials, and that was later cited prominently for this proposition by New York Times Co. v. [read post]