Search for: "PARKER v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED"
Results 141 - 160
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
It limits them to possessing their gun at the address listed on their handgun license, with the sole exception of transporting the gun “directly to and from” one of approximately seven “authorized small arms range/shooting club[s], unloaded, in a locked container, the ammunition to be carried separately. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:57 am
Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
New Issued Cases Three defamation (libel and slander) claims were filed on the media and communications list last week. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:01 pm
Parker, R. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
They cited to notices that they sent to carriers, but the court says these 150 page long lists of titles are insufficient to impart actual knowledge. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
Parker. * Among the other failings of the concept of a sex offender registry, Nebraska’s took a deep dive into mission creep, such that the list of offenses requiring registration went far beyond any cognizable connection to sex offenses. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Last week in the courts On 15 April 2024, there was an injunction application in Stone & Ceramic Limited (CN. 030725144) and others v Parker KB-2024-000833. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Waller v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am
The whole list of questions posed can be found herein. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 145 F.3d 601, 612-13 (3d Cir. 1998) (finding no nexus between challenged insurance policy and services offered to the public from insurance office); Parker v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
In Tatel v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:24 am
The SKAPP website lists those who guided and supported SKAPP’s attempts to subvert expert witness validity requirements; not surprisingly, the SKAPP supporters were mostly plaintiffs’ expert witnesses: Eula Bingham, PhDLes Boden, PhDRichard Clapp, DSc, MPHPolly Hoppin, ScDSheldon Krimsky, PhDDavid Michaels, PhD, MPHDavid Ozonoff, MD, MPHAnthony Robbins, MD, MPA [2] See, e.g., Parker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Parker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Evans v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Toth v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:21 am
Citing its own February 2010 opinion in Litwin v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Parker v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm
Next Week in the Courts We are not aware of any media law cases listed for this week. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
David Harris, who tweeted anonymously as @geeklawyer, was criticised by the BSB for his tweets, but more significantly for not disclosing his role in the website – Newzbin – he was defending. [read post]
