Search for: "PETERS v. HOLDER" Results 141 - 160 of 487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  TM holder free riding/trolling: pressure on mark exclusions/defenses. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am by Ben
It has been held that the right holder did not have an obligation to provide URL’s for the content that the platform should remove in its take down request and a simple indication in the title of the video would be sufficient. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:35 am by Brian Cordery
Brian Corderyby Nadine Bleach The Court of Appeal, overturning Birss J’s decision, decided that in the case of TQ Delta v ZyXEL, the answer was no. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am by Grégoire Desrousseaux
This text provides a similar starting point for the limitation period for actions relating to an infringement of trade secret: it is now calculated from the day on which the legitimate holder of the secret knew or should have known the last fact that is the cause of the infringement. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
  The second case was ViiV Healthcare v Minister of Health, where a judicial review was filed earlier this year. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:04 pm by Adam Levitin
Professor Peter Conti-Brown of the Wharton School has written a short article for Brookings decrying the Second Circuit’s 2015 Madden v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
As a result of the CJEU decision in Huawei v ZTE, obtaining an injunction has become harder for patent holders. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 7:19 am
Keynote speakers and panelists include Ann Harrison (Music: The Business), Peter Hook (New Order) and Jules O’Riordan (Judge Jules). [read post]