Search for: "PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY"
Results 141 - 160
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:04 am
We have whistleblower protections in place so that employees can serve the public interest and go outside of the chain of command. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
Florida, a challenge to a state law that prohibits state universities from using any state funds or administering any non-state funds for travel to a “terrorist state” and also prohibits public officers and employees from being reimbursed for travel to a “terrorist state. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
The U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Environmental concerns also are at the core of the third case, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reconsider and stay its Transport Rule because new information demonstrates EPA's assessments of grid reliability and resource adequacy as a result of the rule are incomplete, inaccurate and lack credibility. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Bd.Court: U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The district court determined that the State was entitled to summary judgment because Helm fell within the "personal staff" exemption to Title VII’s definition of "employee" and thus did not qualify for the protections afforded by the statute. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
In the last three decades, as the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
In the last three decades, as the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Others prefer to take into account external influences, such as human rights and environmental commitments, in the course of investment treaty interpretation. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Others prefer to take into account external influences, such as human rights and environmental commitments, in the course of investment treaty interpretation. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:01 am
Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Internal Revenue Service and various congressional committees. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Sloane, On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility Abstract: In an era of crises (economic, environmental, humanitarian, and even existential), the defensive plea of necessity has become a growth industry in the law of state responsibility, spurred in part by the publication of Article 25 of the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
That commitment is reflected in the many policies and programs that are being implemented by U.S. agencies in response to concerns raised by Native Americans, including poverty, unemployment, environmental degradation, health care gaps, violent crime, and discrimination. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:09 am
Environmental Protection Agency, reacting to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling finding that EPA did have authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, has begun a series of actions under the Act to start regulating such pollution. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, 95-STA-34, D&O of ARB, at 7 (August 8, 1997), aff’d, Clean Harbors Environmental Services v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
