Search for: "Paul Ohm"
Results 141 - 160
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2013, 6:55 pm
Lenard, President and Senior Fellow, Technology Policy Institute Paul Ohm, Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado School of Law Frank A. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:32 pm
* Ohm, Paul. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
As Paul Ohm presciently observed in 2010, the ease of reidentification of presumably anonymous data poses great threats to individual safety. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:45 am
Eric has posted about Professor Ohm's reidentification work, which shows how the distinction between PII and non-PII is becoming less useful: "Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
Paul Ohm argued that that legal solutions are better for cyber civil rights problems than technological solutions. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:36 am
Lindsey Barrett, Laura Moy, Paul Ohm and Ashkan Soltani considered the effects of the Federal Trade Commission’s outdated conflict-of-interest rules. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
As detailed by Paul Ohm, she later proved just a birthdate, zip code and gender is enough to identify 87 percent of the population, and knowing where someone is makes them even easier to ID. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
And while scholars such as Paul Ohm note that under certain circumstances facial recognition technology that tracks a person’s movements would clearly fall under Carpenter, Andrew Ferguson’s testimony before the House Oversight and Reform Committee illustrates that facial recognition technology has different Fourth Amendment implications depending on its use. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:37 pm
As Ethan recaps and as Paul Ohm indicated (United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 6:04 am
Paul Ohm at Co-Op gives a chilling vision of world of private police, security forces that serve their employer, not the public. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:54 pm
But we do need to recognize what Paul Ohm has demonstrated in his recent work: there is an inverse relationship between anonymization and utility for a broad range of data. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:37 pm
But we do need to recognize what Paul Ohm has demonstrated in his recent work: there is an inverse relationship between anonymization and utility for a broad range of data. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 8:02 am
Others have touched on it, including: computer scientists, who have studied “interactive techniques” involving active data administrators who selectively filter and disclose information; (see Paul Ohm’s Broken Promises for discussion); health regulators, who have built the (somewhat related) idea of “health information trustees” or “information custodians” into draft health information legislation; mobile technology (and other software)… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:28 pm
(Paul Ohm calls this "Felten's Third Law".) [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:03 pm
., Paul Ohm, Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization, 57 UCLA Law Review 1701 (2010). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
However, there are others, such as Professor Paul Ohm, who argue that “nonmonetary harm abounds online” and that regulators ought to be able to address those harms – even if they are more subjective in nature – provided that the harms are non-trivial. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
Tom Goldstein of this blog explains the “odd alignment” of the Court’s two majority opinions in Jones, while Paul Ohm of Freedom to Tinker characterizes the three opinions in the case as a “near-optimal result” for those who argue that Fourth Amendment jurisprudence insufficiently protects privacy in light of new technology. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
Piece it all Together and You Get 5 Concurring Opinions Blog: Paul Ohm, Jones is a Near-Optimal Result Concurring Opinions Blog: Margot Kaminski, Three thoughts on U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
" These cases confirm the need for Digital Due Process reforms, as CDT Fellow Paul Ohm and EFF have already noted. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:39 am
Professor Laura Donohue, Moderator, Georgetown University Law Center Professor Jennifer Granick, Stanford Law School, Center for Internet and Society Alex Joel, Civil Liberties Protection Officer, Office of the Director of National Intelligence Rachel Levinson-Waldman, Counsel, Liberty and National Security Program, Brennan Center for Justice Paul Ohm, Senior Policy Advisor, Federal Trade Commission & Professor of Law, University of Colorado Keynote… [read post]
