Search for: "People v Holder" Results 141 - 160 of 2,880
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
It applies to a broad swath of civilian, military, and legislative office holders who swore oaths of fidelity to the Constitution, and it disqualifies such persons from holding in the future any of an extraordinarily broad swath of public offices.Leaving aside the imprecise nature of a "broad sweep," I am inclined to agree with the authors' conclusions about how Section 3 disqualifies Trump. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:19 am by INFORRM
Self-confident people are usually not too concerned about what other people post on their social media pages. [read post]
., a publicly traded Brazilian mining company, to resolve charges related to the company’s “allegedly false and misleading disclosures about the safety of its dams prior to the January 2019 collapse of the Brumadinho dam that killed 270 people. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am by Fred Rocafort
” These restrictions do not extend to green card holders or dual U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
La note conceptuelle de l'événement de cette année et de plus amples informations sont disponibles sur le site web du Forum.Tous les acteurs concernés de toutes les régions sont invités à s’inscrire.INSCRIPTIONS OUVERTESParticipez au Forum pour partager des expériences et vous informer sur les dernières initiatives visant à promouvoir une conduite responsable des entreprises conformément… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Albert W. Alschuler
” According to these courts, Bruen described the holders of Second Amendment rights as ordinary law-abiding citizens “no fewer than fourteen times. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Vince, I don’t want to spend too much debating the question of how pro-bond holder and how out of step with prior law the 19th Century Supreme Court railroad bond cases were (and indeed how out of step they were with the Court’s understanding of non-infrastructure related municipal bond cases like Loan Association v. [read post]