Search for: "People v. Garcia"
Results 141 - 160
of 504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
Garcia, No. 17-834. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
” (About the mildest statement in it was: “After studying the Bible, I have wondered if black people even have souls. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-7563, Garcia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Garcia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:04 am
” Amaro v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Garcia, 983 N.E.2d 259 (N.Y. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
In another big-rig accident case that settled for $3 million in 2018 (Medeiros v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
"The decision is set out below:The People of the State of New York, ex rel. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:05 pm
A new decision, Garcia v. [read post]
Repeat After Me: You May Not Expel a Member of a New York LLC Unless the Operating Agreement Says So
17 Sep 2018, 3:25 am
For an example of a case in which the court upheld the right to expel a member based on authorizing language in the operating agreement, see Garcia v Garcia, 2011 NY Slip Op 52261(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Dec. 6, 2011] . [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
Zinke, … their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:39 am
"From Friday's Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Stanford Law School Immigrants’ Rights Clinic, and the law firm Sidley Austin challenged the practice of prolonged detention in two class action cases—Garcia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:59 pm
They cite U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
” At ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia argues that “Kavanaugh’s 2014 dissenting opinion in SeaWorld of Florida, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 9:04 am
* Remember the Innocence of Muslims video (& its contribution to the important Garcia v Google precedent)? [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am
In its earlier case law (D and Sweden v Council) on same-sex partnerships, the CJEU already ruled that these could not be equated with marriage. [read post]
