Search for: "People v. Miller" Results 141 - 160 of 1,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by SJM
OK, so the title of this post may be an exaggeration of what is only a passing reference to an old friend in Fareham BC v Miller [2013] EWCA Civ 159. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by SJM
OK, so the title of this post may be an exaggeration of what is only a passing reference to an old friend in Fareham BC v Miller [2013] EWCA Civ 159. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:43 am by Will Baude
(Will Baude) The New York Times “room for debate” feature is on the surprisingly technical question of the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 3:13 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an order filed June 17, 2016, the Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District (Division 2) modified its opinion filed April 22, and ordered partially published May 20, 2016, in People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
  He unsuccessfully moved for resentencing in light of Miller v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 3:42 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On August 17, 2016, the California Supreme Court ordered the Fourth District’s opinion in People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 8:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
Within seven years that promise was forgotten, and in Miller v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 3:42 pm by Neil Melliship
The Federal Court of Canada (the “Court”) recently released its decision in Hilton Worldwide Holdings LLP v Miller Thomson, 2018 FC 895. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 pm
Most people seem to think that’s how the law works. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
  For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]