Search for: "People v. House (1970)" Results 141 - 160 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am by JB
After all, when the Democrats controlled the White House and both Houses of Congress between 2009 and 2010, they got a great deal accomplished. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also, there was a House of Lords decision in 1891, Mobil v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:58 am by Mark Ashton
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures and unreasonable invasions of privacy shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, the person or thing to be seized, and the information to be obtained. (1970 (56) 2684; 1971 (57) 315.) [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by J. Tom Minor, IV
This issue was challenged in many state courts in the 1970s and 1980s and the clauses were ultimately upheld in Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. de la Cuesta, 102 S.Ct. 3014, (1982). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:51 pm by Joey Fishkin
 People have been arguing about this issue since a fractured Court in Oregon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
’ This is a reference to the house where defendant bought Moose.Defendant ratcheted up the rhetoric in his next two posts. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:25 am by Jackie McDermott
Suk pointed out that the ERA itself first passed the House in 1970 with no ratification deadline, but when it stalled in the Senate, the deadline was added as a political compromise. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Starbucks added new coffee houses almost as fast as rabbits multiply and never publicized WHO’s finding. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm by Ilya Shapiro
This essay is adapted from his foreword to Eugene Volokh, Sebelius v. [read post]