Search for: "People v. Irvin"
Results 141 - 160
of 197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
The ICO has set out how seven of the UK’s political parties need to improve the way they handle people’s personal data after assessing how they manage data protection. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Nor does the consumer’s lack of understanding have to be reasonable, and there is no required threshold number of people who lacked understanding.[24] Further, a consumer may have a lack of understanding even if he or she is generally aware that a particular consequence may follow—e.g., he or she may be aware of the consequence, but may not understand either the magnitude or likelihood of a particular risk.[25] Evidence of lack of understanding can include direct evidence,… [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Mr Wright has sued a number of people in the crypto industry in an apparent campaign to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious and anonymous inventor of Bitcoin. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:37 am
KZ7180 .I78 2017 Irvin-Erickson, Douglas. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 2:40 pm
Comer, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 11:15 am
In Antonelli v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:51 am
Baker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
He has also been able to attract a pool of dedicated and talented people to support FTI’s continued growth. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Robert Irvin, Michael W. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
This works to bury the sovereign debt owed to First Nations Peoples and licenses the accumulation of further debt through criminalisation of Aboriginal people and the licensing of extractive violence against their lands and waters. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
One might relate, empirically, to how constrained people actually feel when they are criticized by administrators who run an institution. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
Even some of the people involved in the drafting of California’s Senate Bill 94 (“SB 94?) [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
