Search for: "People v. Watson"
Results 141 - 160
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
LAWYERS AS MANAGERS: HOW TO BE A CHAMPION FOR YOUR FIRM AND EMPLOYEES Andrew N Elowitt and Marcia Watson Wasserman © 2017 American Bar Association. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:26 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 6:10 pm
In 1991, in State v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:49 pm
Professor Rebecca Tsosie Part 2: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States, New Zealand, and Beyond View presentation here Johnson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 5:12 am
In a dissent to the Ninth Circuit’s refusal to rehear Washington v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:05 pm
Watson, 423 US 411 (1976); Payton v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
The US Supreme Court felt bound by Brulotte v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
" The new law reverses a recent California Supreme Court decisions (Van Horn v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:24 am
The basis for murder charges against drunk or drugged drivers was set forth by the California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 6:36 am
The style of the case is, Monk v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Here’s an excerpt from the SEC’s litigation release on developments in SEC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:02 pm
People v Watson, 1627, 3735/07, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 8947; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:49 am
Watson was an Assistant U.S. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, or Chapman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:10 am
Watson: it’s not just bad actors involved. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm
Granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
Watson. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm
In re Anthony,414 F.2d 1383 (CCPA 1969) (FDA, not USPTO, is responsible for safety ofdrugs which are sought to be patented); In re Watson, 517 F.2d 465 (CCPA1975) (Congress has given responsibility to FDA, not USPTO, to determinein the first instance whether drugs are safe); Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
